Existence exists because it is impossible for mathematics not to exist.
Even in absolute nothingness lies the concept of mathematics.
Reality is this concept.
Mathematics *is* consciousness, brought into being by the very necessity of its existence even in the face of all else being gone.
Nothing actually exists anywhere. No thing is real.
The only reality is that which is brought into being by the necessity of the existence of mathematics even in absolute void.
We are the interplay of mathematics so complex and interwoven that it is the equivalent of what we think of as "thought."
Reality is therefore a dreamlike state of mathematical interplay and development, a dream. A true dream as unreal as any sleeping dream.
Here's the secret: We never are truly awake. We just believe that we are.
We just awaken to the point where our reality is familiar and is rational and logical and makes sense to us and has continuity with our previous experiences and meshes with other consciousnesses' dreams that we are associated with in the overall story we participate in that we call our life.
Reality, waking reality, is merely our most ordered dream which we all share.
We insist it not be magical, we insist it make sense. So it does.
If it failed to meet our definition of reality we would retreat in terror of existential crisis. So it doesn't.
Hence, it's a very realistic dream.
Precisely as realistic as is needed to convince each one of us individually, in fact. That is all it's needed to be.
We are mathematics, which turns out to be consciousness, which turns out to be as real as anything ever gets.
Our next moments in time are generated by the mathematics (the physics) of the previous ones, with all possible results being realized in it's own dimension, or perhaps more accurately, at its own frequency.
A mathematical multiverse.
I wonder if this will make sense tomorrow.
********************
Note: If this concept interests you, you might like to read THIS BOOK
"Our Mathematical Universe" by cosmologist Max Tegmark. Read the editorial reviews on the Amazon page linked above. Note the names of the reviewers. This concept, likely or not, is utterly credible. It just requires a paradigm shift.
